[quote name=\'Ian Wallis\' date=\'Jan 8 2005, 03:40 PM\']
Having said that, I would have liked to have seen them give the champ a little something for winning the game - e.g. if they didn't have enough to get to the next level, maybe they should have at least got a little cash added to their total, that way if they lost the next game they'd at least have something. It's possible on that show to win three or four games, and only leave with the $200 or so you won the games with - if you didn't buy any instant bargains along the way.
[snapback]70594[/snapback]
[/quote]
That's what the Instant Bargains and Fame games were there for!
No doubt, Shopping was the better bonus game. Shopping produced what I think was the best drama in game shows. To see the life changing huge wins by people like John Goss, Tim Hollerin and Alice Conkright was something else. The shopping bit also offered more unique prizes.
The Winner's Board was ok. A lot of the prizes became more cheap and there was very little risk until the end where you would risk all the 10 major prizes you earned on that board for an additional $50,000. The only advantage of this bonus game is that people actually left with the prizes if defeated. But still, you could leave with prizes from again the Instant Bargains and Fame Games.
Now the Winner's Big Money Game was not bad, but as previous posters stated, it was on the wrong show. This game really had NOTHING to do with Shopping, or SALE of the Century. Too bad the music was revamped so good to such a bad season for $OTC.